The year 2025 marks a decisive turning point in the field of justice with the emergence of a revolutionary AI clone. This new technological player promises to transform criminal trials by bringing an unprecedented perspective to murderers. The impact of this innovation is arousing both fascination and concern, as courts explore the possibilities offered by artificial intelligence to deliver more informed verdicts.
How does this AI clone fit into today’s judicial system? What are the ethical and legal issues raised by its use? Find out how this technological breakthrough is redefining the contours of modern justice.
Tragic incident of road rage in Chandler, Arizona
In 2021, 37-year-old Chris Pelkey tragically lost his life in a road rage incident in Chandler, Arizona. This dramatic event took place when he was fatally shot by Gabriel Horcasitas at a red light. Recently, during the trial of his killer, Chris’ family used artificial intelligence to virtually “appear” him in court.
Using voice recordings, videos and photographs, they recreated his image and voice, enabling Chris to deliver a statement of emotional impact. This innovative use of AI has sparked debate about its role in court proceedings.
Technological Innovation in the Service of Justice
At the sentencing of Gabriel Horcasitas, artificial intelligence enabled Chris Pelkey to be virtually present to express his emotional impact. Using voice recordings, videos and photographs, his family were able to recreate his image and voice, a first in victim impact statements.
This was intended to convey Chris’s message of forgiveness, written by his sister Stacey Wales, who was inspired by her brother’s caring nature. Judge Todd Lang praised this innovative approach, although the use of AI in the courts raises discussions about its ethical implications and alignment with the victims’ true intentions.
Reactions and Ethical Implications of AI Use
Judge Todd Lang acknowledged the unprecedented use of AI at the trial, emphasizing the sincerity of Chris Pelkey’s message of forgiveness. However, this technological innovation in the legal field is giving rise to ethical debates. Experts are expressing concern about the AI’s faithfulness to the victims’ true intentions.
Stacey Wales, Chris’s sister, insists on the importance of an ethical approach, comparing AI to a powerful tool that can be used to good effect. Other recent cases, such as the use of AI avatars by the Arizona Supreme Court or a deepfake video in New York litigation, illustrate the growing integration of AI into the justice system.
